Thursday, November 06, 2008

Well, actually, I do have a post election admission on how Bush failed to respect our fundamental rights: he allowed his department of justice to basically look the other way to massive levels of voter fraud. In addition, his lax attitude towards illegal immigration led to even more voter fraud by persons who weren't even citizens to begin with. Oh, and his administration looked the other way when Saint Obama turned off the address verification system for his credit card contributors. So, I.P. Freely and Joe Stalin along with Mickey Mouse were able to dump millions of dollars of contributions into Obama's war chest. McCain, of course, was too busy magnanimously working on his concession speech to raise any real objections to any of these things.

So, the story of Tan Nguyen is one example where attempts to stop voter fraud is prosecuted as voter suppression. Similar arguments were made throughout the country. The Ohio Secretary of State said the same things as she declined to vet incoming votes.

So, is avoiding voter fraud a fundamental right? Is it a bad thing only when you disagree with it? Doesn't a fraudulent vote cancel out your vote? Doesn't that suppress your vote? So, was Obama aiding and abetting disenfranchisement of unknown number of voters across the country.

Do you think the Obama administration is going to make stopping organized (i.e., ACORN enabled) voter fraud a priority? Is that RICO suit likely to stayopen?

I don't think that ACORN's registration of the Dallas Cowboys and Mickey Mouse, Obama campaigners voting in Ohio and in their homestate, college kids doing the same, or idiot Philadelphians who admit to voting twice on CNN added up to Obama's popular vote margin. However, there are several states that were close. There are congressmen and Senators who lost close races. And they lost because of this voter fraud.

ACORN, with their millions of fradulent voters needed to be hit with a RICO suit back in 2000. Obama should have at least been forced to operate within the law during his campaign. Instead, he gave them $800,000.

I guess right and wrong does not matter to some people.

No comments: