A further discussion of Obama's respect for "our rights" continued.

As a disciple of Saul Alinsky, we've seen the tactics espoused by Rules for Radicals in the current campaign, and we will see them used in Obama's administration. These examples are not that outlanding, the Bush 43 White House had many DOJ prosecutors who have already used these tactics. Now this is not a criticism about Bush being Hitler, blah blah blah, it's more of a criticism that he kept aboard DOJ lawyers who were apt to go after the wrong people. He should have fired everyone when he came in. But, dipshit decided to be magnanimous and keep those thug Clinton lawyers in the stable.

This article provides some more insight. As I said, what is chilling is that you can come up with examples of how this stuff has already been used in the recent election cycle.

"Watch what Michael Barone called the Obama "thugocracy" use the Justice Department to stifle dissent. Anybody who complains about vote fraud will be charged with "vote suppression." Anybody who complains about DoJ's actions will be charged with interfering with an investigation. Anybody who denies having interfered will be charged with perjury. Likewise, anybody who peacefully protests abortion clinics or the use of state-sponsored racial quotas will be charged with a civil rights violation."

Tan Nguyen was investigated and bankrupted for "vote suppression" because his campaign issued a letter warning illegals not to vote. Similar threats were (I witnessed this) made again poll watchers in 2004 warning them of the liklihood of jail time for "vote suppression," by asking for IDs. Of course, stopping fradulent voting isn't a priority, especially by Obama voters in swing states. From CNN, "It's time for change, man," Jones said. He complained about the long lines and said that "I decided to come back and vote a couple times." "I think that's against the law, but it's okay, all right. Well, thanks, Ron,"



We already saw how Jack Ryan and Joe the Plumber learned about the "Chicago Way."

Of course, all you Ozombies who voted for Hope and Change and for Obama to pay for your gas and mortgage, and to make the world love us knew all this stuff already. You've mindlessly repeated stuff about Bush rewriting the bill of rights or something because he maintained that the executive had commander in chief powers to spy on our enemies, including phone calls between people in America and known overseas Al Qaeda operatives.

Second, the recently uncovered 2001 interview of Obama illustrates what he means by change, Change is wealth redistribution. So, what is hope? Meh, that's a just a meaningless phrase used to hypnotize the gullible, suckers.

"I think that there was a tendency to lose track of the political and community organizing and activities on the ground that are able to put together the actual coalitions of power through which you bring about redistributed change and in some ways we still suffer from that. "

Ah, yes, redistribution. That sort of goes against a fundemental liberty: the security in one's possessions. At least Europe loves us now, right?